Horror
had a major problem, it developed and evolved until it eventually reached the
gory slasher movies of the 80s, the formula for those films (first half filled
with teen sex, second half filled with teen slaughter) became the cheap formula
to replicate. The next craze was the found footage frenzy post- The Blair Witch
Project, cheap to make and trying to convince those watching that it might
actually be a documentary. So the problem became that horror lost its
inventiveness and everything became a cheap slasher film or a cheap found
footage film, horror might now be finding its feet again. Last year saw the
terrifying Babadook, and this year sees the brilliant It Follows. What these
films understand is shouting boo makes you jump, but creating a sense of dread
will keep you up at night. It follows sees Maika Monroe’s Jay have sex with a
boy, only to discover that having sex with him has passed on a form of curse,
where a being that can look like anyone and is referred to only as “It” will
follow you until it can eventually kills you, if you sleep with someone else
you can pass it on the them, but after it kills them it will eventually work
its way back down to you. What’s fantastic about this film is that draws
inspiration from exactly the right areas, particularly the work of John
Carpenter circa 1970s. Rather than relying on close-ups and editing, director
David Robert Mitchell utilises beautifully composed long shots as various forms
of “It” creep into frame. The appearances of “It” are perfectly composed and
you spend your time viewing the film wondering like Jay if “It” is close and
who could it be. The performances are all great, the teen characters feel
really genuine rather than the stereotypes often depicted in usual horror fare they
all feel like real people. The depiction of sex as an act leading to potential
demise isn’t one particularly unique to horror, more often than not the
survivor of a horror film is the white virgin female, however what’s
fascinating about this is once Jay is given this curse, she becomes the victim
but she is also instilled with a sense of power, she could have sex with
someone and potentially seal their doom. It’s a shame that given the films
strong showing that it falters a little in its final act, it doesn’t exactly
know how to solve the conflict between Jay ant “It” and the show down doesn’t
seem entirely at piece with the rest of the film. Fortunately the films closing
scene uses ambiguity to its strength leaving multiple interpretations, none of which
are going to make it any easier for me to get to sleep tonight. (5 Stars)
The Film Surgeon is...
A digital forum for me to share my views and opinions expecting them to be duly ignored.
Monday, 23 November 2015
It Follows Review
Horror
had a major problem, it developed and evolved until it eventually reached the
gory slasher movies of the 80s, the formula for those films (first half filled
with teen sex, second half filled with teen slaughter) became the cheap formula
to replicate. The next craze was the found footage frenzy post- The Blair Witch
Project, cheap to make and trying to convince those watching that it might
actually be a documentary. So the problem became that horror lost its
inventiveness and everything became a cheap slasher film or a cheap found
footage film, horror might now be finding its feet again. Last year saw the
terrifying Babadook, and this year sees the brilliant It Follows. What these
films understand is shouting boo makes you jump, but creating a sense of dread
will keep you up at night. It follows sees Maika Monroe’s Jay have sex with a
boy, only to discover that having sex with him has passed on a form of curse,
where a being that can look like anyone and is referred to only as “It” will
follow you until it can eventually kills you, if you sleep with someone else
you can pass it on the them, but after it kills them it will eventually work
its way back down to you. What’s fantastic about this film is that draws
inspiration from exactly the right areas, particularly the work of John
Carpenter circa 1970s. Rather than relying on close-ups and editing, director
David Robert Mitchell utilises beautifully composed long shots as various forms
of “It” creep into frame. The appearances of “It” are perfectly composed and
you spend your time viewing the film wondering like Jay if “It” is close and
who could it be. The performances are all great, the teen characters feel
really genuine rather than the stereotypes often depicted in usual horror fare they
all feel like real people. The depiction of sex as an act leading to potential
demise isn’t one particularly unique to horror, more often than not the
survivor of a horror film is the white virgin female, however what’s
fascinating about this is once Jay is given this curse, she becomes the victim
but she is also instilled with a sense of power, she could have sex with
someone and potentially seal their doom. It’s a shame that given the films
strong showing that it falters a little in its final act, it doesn’t exactly
know how to solve the conflict between Jay ant “It” and the show down doesn’t
seem entirely at piece with the rest of the film. Fortunately the films closing
scene uses ambiguity to its strength leaving multiple interpretations, none of which
are going to make it any easier for me to get to sleep tonight. (5 Stars)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment