Christopher Nolan is now in his post blockbuster franchise phase, his
next move was going to really test his metal, he could have gone for a small
film to find his feet again, or you could do what only Nolan would do, and head
off to outer space. Based on the theoretical work of physicist Kip Thorne,
Interstellar has been around for a long time and was formerly a Spielberg
property. It's a film that REALLY wears it's science on its sleeve, and given
that it's based on the work of one of the earth smartest men it really holds
up, it's problem is however that it's occasionally too smart for its own good,
it doesn't need to simplify it but there are moments when intelligent physics
jargon is just dumped on your head for you to try and make sense of. It also
seems to suffer from a lack expression, the space scenes are infrequently
beautiful but spoiled by the persistence of using shots from the hull of the
ships, and the planets themselves though impressive also seem muted in style,
lots of dark greys and then lighter shades of grey. Its surprising then that
given all the films intelligence the moments when its at its best are when it
shows it has a heart. The father daughter relationship is at the heart of this
film, and you really feel the strain that the brilliant McConaughey goes
through to leave his family, one sequence where he catches up on 23 years’
worth of messages from home is truly heart-breaking. Hans Zimmer also provides
a score that could be his best with Nolan to date. The final 20 minutes does
seem to slip into full on Kubrick existential sci-fi where things don’t fully
resolve in a satisfactory manner, and it may need a larger sense of humour, but
the exceptional thing about Nolan’s latest work is its ambition. It’s a film
that definitely doesn’t succeed everywhere, but it reached for the moon, and it
just might well have caught a star. (Low
5 Stars)
The Film Surgeon is...
A digital forum for me to share my views and opinions expecting them to be duly ignored.
Monday, 23 November 2015
Interstellar Review
Christopher Nolan is now in his post blockbuster franchise phase, his
next move was going to really test his metal, he could have gone for a small
film to find his feet again, or you could do what only Nolan would do, and head
off to outer space. Based on the theoretical work of physicist Kip Thorne,
Interstellar has been around for a long time and was formerly a Spielberg
property. It's a film that REALLY wears it's science on its sleeve, and given
that it's based on the work of one of the earth smartest men it really holds
up, it's problem is however that it's occasionally too smart for its own good,
it doesn't need to simplify it but there are moments when intelligent physics
jargon is just dumped on your head for you to try and make sense of. It also
seems to suffer from a lack expression, the space scenes are infrequently
beautiful but spoiled by the persistence of using shots from the hull of the
ships, and the planets themselves though impressive also seem muted in style,
lots of dark greys and then lighter shades of grey. Its surprising then that
given all the films intelligence the moments when its at its best are when it
shows it has a heart. The father daughter relationship is at the heart of this
film, and you really feel the strain that the brilliant McConaughey goes
through to leave his family, one sequence where he catches up on 23 years’
worth of messages from home is truly heart-breaking. Hans Zimmer also provides
a score that could be his best with Nolan to date. The final 20 minutes does
seem to slip into full on Kubrick existential sci-fi where things don’t fully
resolve in a satisfactory manner, and it may need a larger sense of humour, but
the exceptional thing about Nolan’s latest work is its ambition. It’s a film
that definitely doesn’t succeed everywhere, but it reached for the moon, and it
just might well have caught a star. (Low
5 Stars)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment